OnchainCasinoIndex

Is that crypto casino legit? Check the public index.

Independent on-chain crypto casino index. Public scores, dated sources. Scores are never for sale.

Each review answers that question first, in plain words, then shows the dated facts behind it: who runs the site, who holds your money, identity checks, withdrawals, restricted countries, and where every statement comes from.

Find an operator, A to Z

  • 20 operators reviewed
  • 2 closed, kept on record
  • Last review
  • Scores are never for sale.

Browse by

SPONSORED

Sponsored partners

These operators pay us a commission. The order of this block is commercial, not a ranking: scores and ranks are set by the public grid and are never for sale.

The full ranking, by public trust score →

The ranking is computed from the public grid alone and includes every live operator we track (20), partner or not.

Latest changes

Dated edits across every review, newest first.

  1. BC.GAME

    Sponsored link added: we now have an affiliate relationship with BC.GAME, and the button on this page is a labelled sponsored link. The score and the rank did not change.

  2. BC.GAME

    Score update: survival 15→14 — terms name an Anjouan licence, not Curaçao; Chile ordered ISPs to block the site in September 2026.

  3. BC.GAME

    Re-reviewed: licence corrected from Curaçao to Anjouan (ALSI-202410011-FI1) and operator Twocent Technology Limited (Belize) per BC.GAME's general terms; restricted list rebuilt from the terms and user agreement (incl. Ontario); Chile ISP block (September 2026) added.

  4. Cloudbet

    Re-reviewed: added the operating company, the licence number with the regulator's register status ("assessment in progress"), the official restricted-country list, verification levels and limits, withdrawal and fee statements, Trustpilot findings and a "mixed" verdict.

  5. CoinPoker

    Score update: payout 16→13 — Trustpilot has suspended the profile's rating; unverified withdrawal complaints in remaining reviews.

  6. CoinPoker

    Re-reviewed: confirmed that the operator's site states an Anjouan licence (not checked with the regulator) and a 2017 start, noted that registration needs no KYC per the homepage, recorded that no restricted-country list is published, and added Trustpilot findings (rating suspended for fake reviews) with a "caution" verdict. Terms of service could not be opened.

Graveyard

Open the graveyard →

Operators that shut down stay on the record, with what happened and the sources.

  • Luck.io

    Closed April 2026

  • ZKasino

    Closed April 2024

How the grid works

Each criterion is scored in points out of its weight, so the five numbers add up to the total. Nothing is normalised, curved or weighted a second time.

  1. Payout proof 25 pts

    Whether money comes back out, and whether anyone outside the operator can show that it did. Payout hashes, withdrawal behaviour, reported disputes.

  2. Transparency 25 pts

    How much of the operation a stranger can check without asking: on-chain game logic, a readable treasury, published fairness records, an owner you can name.

  3. Survival 20 pts

    How long it has run, through what, and what happens to balances if it stops. Age is evidence; marketing spend is not.

  4. Freedom 15 pts

    What it costs a player to use it: custody of funds, KYC thresholds, account limits, geographic gates.

  5. Value 15 pts

    Catalogue depth and whether the house edge, fees and rewards are stated in figures rather than adjectives.

Caps. Three caps can pull a total down: an operator we have not deposit-tested cannot exceed 85; a custodial house with no on-chain game logic cannot exceed 12 of 25 on transparency; a dark operator scores zero on survival and leaves the live ranking.

Questions we get

Are these scores verified?

Mostly not. A total marked SEED is a desk reading of public information, and an operator we have not deposit-tested cannot pass 85. A row marked VERIFIED holds withdrawals we reconciled on-chain ourselves, published as hashes on the payouts page: the cap lifts, but VERIFIED covers payouts only, and the other criteria remain desk estimates from public information.

Can an operator pay to rank higher?

No. Scores are never for sale. The grid, the weights and the caps are published, and the registry is downloadable, so anyone can recompute a total and challenge it. We do carry sponsored links: the operators that pay us a commission are listed in the "Sponsored partners" block above, whose order is commercial, not a ranking. Every one of those links says "Sponsored link" on its face, the list that sets that block is not read by the scoring code at all, and partners keep their own verdicts, "caution" included. Recompute a total from the registry and you get the number we show.

What does "on-chain" mean on this site?

It is a ladder, not a badge. T1 is crypto at the cashier. T2 is a crypto casino whose games are still a black box. T3 adds a real on-chain artefact such as a public bankroll. T4 means the game logic, the randomness and the payout all execute in contracts you can replay from chain data. A "?" after a tier means the operator claims it and we have not confirmed it.

Read the method before you read the ranking

The methodology page holds the whole protocol: what each criterion measures, how the caps work, the on-chain tier ladder, and what we do and do not do.

Read the methodology Full ranking